Re: [PATCH v1 15/36] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison()
Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:09:59 +0100
| Newsgroups | com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-ide,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 02:02:02PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 28.08.25 17:45, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:19AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > The nth_page() is not really required anymore, so let's remove it. > > > While at it, cleanup and simplify the code a bit. > > > > Hm Not sure which bit is the cleanup? Was there meant to be more here or? > > Thanks, leftover from the pre-split of this patch! Thanks! :) (Am replying even on 'not really needing a reply' like this so I know which stuff I replied to :P) > > -- > Cheers > > David / dhildenb > > Cheers, Lorenzo