Re: [PATCH v1 11/36] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs
"Liam R. Howlett" <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Aug 2025 10:27:46 -0400
| Newsgroups | com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.kernel.vger.linux-ide,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <le23yqshxkwqzdoj3pgv3kt6epxtshfu5omxcr4egkhuhh3wyb@afauanocxw34> |
* David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> [250827 18:05]: > Let's limit the maximum folio size in problematic kernel config where > the memmap is allocated per memory section (SPARSEMEM without > SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) to a single memory section. > > Currently, only a single architectures supports ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE > but not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP: sh. > > Fortunately, the biggest hugetlb size sh supports is 64 MiB > (HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_64MB) and the section size is at least 64 MiB > (SECTION_SIZE_BITS == 26), so their use case is not degraded. > > As folios and memory sections are naturally aligned to their order-2 size > in memory, consequently a single folio can no longer span multiple memory > sections on these problematic kernel configs. > > nth_page() is no longer required when operating within a single compound > page / folio. > > Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/mm.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index 77737cbf2216a..2dee79fa2efcf 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -2053,11 +2053,25 @@ static inline long folio_nr_pages(const struct folio *folio) > return folio_large_nr_pages(folio); > } > > -/* Only hugetlbfs can allocate folios larger than MAX_ORDER */ > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE > -#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER > -#else > +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE) > +/* > + * We don't expect any folios that exceed buddy sizes (and consequently > + * memory sections). > + */ > #define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER MAX_PAGE_ORDER > +#elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) > +/* > + * Only pages within a single memory section are guaranteed to be > + * contiguous. By limiting folios to a single memory section, all folio > + * pages are guaranteed to be contiguous. > + */ > +#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PFN_SECTION_SHIFT > +#else > +/* > + * There is no real limit on the folio size. We limit them to the maximum we > + * currently expect (e.g., hugetlb, dax). > + */ > +#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER > #endif > > #define MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES (1UL << MAX_FOLIO_ORDER) > -- > 2.50.1 >