Re: [PATCH v2 26/37] drm/i915/gem: drop nth_page() usage within SG entry

On 01/09/2025 16:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> It's no longer required to use nth_page() when iterating pages within a
> single SG entry, so let's drop the nth_page() usage.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]>
> Cc: Simona Vetter <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> index c16a57160b262..031d7acc16142 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c
> @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ __i915_gem_object_get_page(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, pgoff_t n)
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_struct_page(obj));
>   
>   	sg = i915_gem_object_get_sg(obj, n, &offset);
> -	return nth_page(sg_page(sg), offset);
> +	return sg_page(sg) + offset;
>   }
>   
>   /* Like i915_gem_object_get_page(), but mark the returned page dirty */

LGTM. If you want an ack to merge via a tree other than i915 you have 
it. I suspect it might be easier to coordinate like that.

Regards,

Tvrtko