RE: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH v3] hung_task: Panic after fixed number of hung tasks
"Li,Rongqing" <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Oct 2025 02:14:58 +0000
| Newsgroups | com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard,org.kernel.vger.kernel-janitors,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-aspeed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> …
> > This patch extends the …
>
> Will another imperative wording approach become more helpful for an
> improved change description?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Docum
> entation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17#n94
>
will fix in next version
>
> …
> > +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
> …
> @@ -229,9 +232,11 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t,
> unsigned long timeout) …
> > trace_sched_process_hang(t);
> >
> > - if (sysctl_hung_task_panic) {
> > + if (sysctl_hung_task_panic &&
> > + (total_hung_task >= sysctl_hung_task_panic)) {
> …
>
> I suggest to use the following source code variant instead.
>
> if (sysctl_hung_task_panic && total_hung_task >= sysctl_hung_task_panic)
> {
>
will fix in next version
thanks
-Li
>
> Regards,
> Markus