Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI: CPPC: Add CPPC v4 support (ACPI 6.6)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> Fri, 8 May 2026 21:01:22 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.acpica-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJZ5v0gCSPjnxE2Vd+Py14ENJ6U46KBQVHiBetLfEKGybtDh8g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 4:25 PM Sumit Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > Add initial kernel support for CPPC v4 (ACPI 6.6, Section 8.4.6), > which extends the _CPC package from 23 to 25 entries with two > optional fields: > > - OSPM Nominal Performance (8.4.6.1.2.6): register used by OSPM > to tell the platform what it considers nominal. The platform > classifies performance above this as boost and below as > throttle for power/thermal decisions. > > - Resource Priority (8.4.6.1.2.7): Package of Resource Priority > Register Descriptor sub-packages. Full parsing is not yet > implemented; such entries are marked as unsupported. > > Patch 1: Add v4 _CPC parsing - validate the 25-entry layout, > handle the Resource Priority package, and mark the two new > registers optional. > > Patch 2: Add acpi_cppc/ospm_nominal_perf as a read-write sysfs > attribute, and initialize it to the platform nominal value > during cppc_cpufreq policy init. > > --- > v1[1] -> v2: > - Patch 1: added Reviewed-by from Mario Limonciello. > - Patch 2: > - Make ospm_nominal_perf sysfs read-write; cache last write in > cpc_desc and skip redundant register writes. > - Validate input in cppc_set_ospm_nominal_perf. > > Sumit Gupta (2): > ACPI: CPPC: Add support for CPPC v4 > ACPI: CPPC: Add ospm_nominal_perf support > > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 10 ++++ > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 14 ++++- > 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ > > -- Can you please see the sashiko.dev feedback on this set: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260430142430.755437-1-sumitg%40nvidia.com and let me know what you think? Especially regarding the second patch?