Re: [PATCH 0/2] CPPC: reduce FFH feedback-counter sampling skew on arm64
Sumit Gupta <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Jun 2026 21:24:47 +0530
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.acpica-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/04/26 15:11, Pengjie Zhang wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > The legacy CPPC feedback-counter path reads the delivered and reference > performance counters separately. > > On arm64 systems using AMU-backed CPPC FFH counters, each FFH read is > served through a cross-CPU counter read helper. Reading the counters > separately therefore widens the sampling window between them and can > skew the delivered/reference ratio used by cpuinfo_cur_freq. Under heavy > load, the skew is observable as transient values that may exceed the > platform maximum, as discussed in [1] and [2]. > > This series adds a small generic hook for architectures that can obtain > both FFH feedback counters in one operation, while preserving the > existing per-register read path as the fallback. > > Patch 1 adds the generic CPPC hook and uses it from cppc_get_perf_ctrs(). > Patch 2 implements the hook on arm64 by sampling both AMU counters in a > single operation on the target CPU. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > Signed-off-by: Pengjie Zhang <[email protected]> > > Pengjie Zhang (2): > ACPI: CPPC: add paired FFH feedback-counter read hook > arm64: topology: read CPPC FFH feedback counters in one operation > > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 7 ++++ > 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > -- Hi Pengjie, Thanks for the patches. The series looks good to me, and it fixes the cpuinfo_cur_freq spikes on an NVIDIA Vera (FFH) platform. Just one nit on patch 2 (counter read order), noted there. Tested-by: Sumit Gupta <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sumit Gupta <[email protected]> Thanks, Sumit