Re: [PATCH 00/17] Introduce and use generic parity32/64 helper

Yu-Chun Lin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.brcm80211,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-input,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-serial,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev
Message-ID <Z7yR1C4nC1UTrX5e@eleanor-wkdl> 
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:58:49PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> More so than __builtin_parity() ?
> 
> I'm all for reducing the duplication, but the compiler may well have a
> better parity approach than the xor-folding implementation here. Looks
> like we can get this to two instructions on powerpc64, for example.

Hi Jeremy,

Thank for your input. We will do that in V2.

Best regards,
Yu-Chun Lin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.