Re: [PATCH net-deletions v2] net: remove unused ATM protocols and legacy ATM device drivers
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:53:29 +0300
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.bridge,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 08:41:27PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2026, at 7:05 AM, David Woodhouse <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2026-04-21 at 21:18 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: ... > >> I'm still deleting the solos driver, chances are nobody uses it. > >> Easy enough to revert back in since core is still around. > >> The guiding principle is to keep USB modems and delete > >> the rest as USB ADSL2+ CPEs were most popular historically. > > > > Still not entirely convinced; I worked on both USB ATM modems and on > > Solos, and the Solos is both the most modern and the only one I still > > actually have. And the only one we have native support for that could > > ever do full 24Mb/s ADSL2+, I believe. > > > > If we drop it, OpenWrt will need to drop support for these, which I > > think were quite popular at the time; there were a few UK resellers: > > https://openwrt.org/toh/traverse/geos1_1 > > > > I still don't actually care *enough* to try to find an ADSL line I > > could plug one into for testing though... :) > > I have 3 boards lying around if anyone wants them. The problem as I understand it is in one's willing to maintain and support that driver while doing regular testing... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko