Re: [PATCH net-deletions v2] net: remove unused ATM protocols and legacy ATM device drivers

Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Apr 2026 10:53:29 +0300
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.bridge,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.netdev,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev
Organization Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 08:41:27PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 2026, at 7:05 AM, David Woodhouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2026-04-21 at 21:18 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

...

> >>    I'm still deleting the solos driver, chances are nobody uses it.
> >>    Easy enough to revert back in since core is still around.
> >>    The guiding principle is to keep USB modems and delete
> >>    the rest as USB ADSL2+ CPEs were most popular historically.
> > 
> > Still not entirely convinced; I worked on both USB ATM modems and on
> > Solos, and the Solos is both the most modern and the only one I still
> > actually have. And the only one we have native support for that could
> > ever do full 24Mb/s ADSL2+, I believe.
> > 
> > If we drop it, OpenWrt will need to drop support for these, which I
> > think were quite popular at the time; there were a few UK resellers:
> > https://openwrt.org/toh/traverse/geos1_1
> > 
> > I still don't actually care *enough* to try to find an ADSL line I
> > could plug one into for testing though... :)
> 
> I have 3 boards lying around if anyone wants them.

The problem as I understand it is in one's willing to maintain and
support that driver while doing regular testing...

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko