Re: How can Autoconf help with the transition to stricter compilation defaults?
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:40:27 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.c-std-porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAH8yC8=2YqtpU-6d4NWdVDx7D2xM4FrxmVJ9AWWKO_piUVa3_w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 1:18 PM Paul Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > If Clang's threatened pickiness were of some real use elsewhere, it > might be justifiable for default Clang to break Autoconf. But so far we > haven't seen real-world uses that would justify this pickiness for > Autoconf's use of 'char memset_explicit(void);'. This line of arguments is not persuasive. It is full of logical fallacies. Maybe the Autoconf folks should argue something along the lines of, "this is the _only_ way to do it because <...>." Jeff