Re: On time64 and Large File Support
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Mar 2023 21:46:42 -0800
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.c-std-porting |
|---|---|
| Organization | UCLA Computer Science Department |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/2/23 02:38, Andreas Schwab wrote: > There is a huge difference between them: time_t has a flag day, off_t > doesn't. Absolutely right. Another thing that's different is that when off_t grew in the 1990s, people said they needed a wider off_t RIGHT NOW, because programs wouldn't work on large inputs otherwise. The pressure to build with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 was large enough that a working consensus was reached pretty quickly to build that way. In contrast, people don't urgently need a wider time_t until 2038. So the "let's be organized about this and do things systematically" sentiment wins, and because other things take priority time_t conversion never gets done. (Or possibly the "either the platform or I will be dead by 2038 so let's do nothing" sentiment wins, which is another seemingly-good reason to do nothing....)