Re: time for Autoconf 2.72 (was: On time64 and Large File Support)

Sam James <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Mar 2023 00:57:52 +0000
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.c-std-porting
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Jim Meyering <[email protected]> writes:

> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 7:52=E2=80=AFPM Paul Eggert <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>> On 3/17/23 19:08, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> > Can someone see if there's some small/safe set of changes that are ess=
ential?
>> > If none (or few/easy), I might have time to make a snapshot soon.
>>
>> As far as I know, none of the pending patches are essential and we can
>> release what we have.
>
> Good. Thanks. It just so happens that I'm about to make a snapshot of
> grep (for this:
> https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-grep/2023-03/msg00005.html) using the very
> latest autoconf, including many changes that were not used in making
> grep-3.9 (I was surprised to realize 3.9 was bootstrapped with
> something near v2.72a-65-gd081ac3e, from October(!)). Let's see how
> grep snapshot testing goes, and if there's no objection by then, I'll
> plan to make an autoconf snapshot within a week or so.

Thanks Jim. Please give me a shout if I can assist. And I'll go test
the new grep snap.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iOUEARYKAI0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCZBZeRF8UgAAAAAAuAChp
c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB
NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MA8cc2FtQGdlbnRv
by5vcmcACgkQc4QJ9SDfkZAUFgD6AvpewqDoBRLLkh5CXlNCsApWsNbSAWP3WZVT
L+huK0kA/30S5sjIFDgzaUnMRHkdTHRRS7XDszyyA4RwmATnTm0O
=oajk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--