Re: time for Autoconf 2.72 (was: On time64 and Large File Support)
Sam James <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Mar 2023 00:57:52 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.c-std-porting |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim Meyering <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 7:52=E2=80=AFPM Paul Eggert <[email protected]> = wrote: >> On 3/17/23 19:08, Jim Meyering wrote: >> > Can someone see if there's some small/safe set of changes that are ess= ential? >> > If none (or few/easy), I might have time to make a snapshot soon. >> >> As far as I know, none of the pending patches are essential and we can >> release what we have. > > Good. Thanks. It just so happens that I'm about to make a snapshot of > grep (for this: > https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-grep/2023-03/msg00005.html) using the very > latest autoconf, including many changes that were not used in making > grep-3.9 (I was surprised to realize 3.9 was bootstrapped with > something near v2.72a-65-gd081ac3e, from October(!)). Let's see how > grep snapshot testing goes, and if there's no objection by then, I'll > plan to make an autoconf snapshot within a week or so. Thanks Jim. Please give me a shout if I can assist. And I'll go test the new grep snap. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOUEARYKAI0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCZBZeRF8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MA8cc2FtQGdlbnRv by5vcmcACgkQc4QJ9SDfkZAUFgD6AvpewqDoBRLLkh5CXlNCsApWsNbSAWP3WZVT L+huK0kA/30S5sjIFDgzaUnMRHkdTHRRS7XDszyyA4RwmATnTm0O =oajk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--