Re: [PATCH] firmware: google: coreboot_table: skip no-map CBMEM entries
Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Jul 2026 07:59:51 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.chrome-platform,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 03:23:30PM +0800, Hsin-Te Yuan wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 3:44 PM Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 09:19:18AM +0000, Hsin-Te Yuan wrote: > > > @@ -147,6 +149,23 @@ static int coreboot_table_populate(struct device *dev, void *ptr, resource_size_ > > > > > > switch (device->entry.tag) { > > > case LB_TAG_CBMEM_ENTRY: > > > + /* > > > + * Skip entries that are not exclusively System RAM or > > > + * Reserved memory. > > > + * On ARM, no-map reserved regions are not System RAM. To be specific, On ARM, no-map reserved regions are IORESOURCE_MEM. > > > + * On x86, CBMEM often resides in IORES_DESC_RESERVED regions. > > > + */ > > > + if (region_intersects(device->cbmem_entry.address, > > > + device->cbmem_entry.entry_size, > > > + IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, > > > + IORES_DESC_NONE) != REGION_INTERSECTS && > > > + region_intersects(device->cbmem_entry.address, > > > + device->cbmem_entry.entry_size, > > > + IORESOURCE_MEM, > > > + IORES_DESC_RESERVED) != REGION_INTERSECTS) { > > > > Per comments of region_intersects(): > > Note that REGION_INTERSECTS is also returned in the case when the > > specified region overlaps RAM and undefined memory holes. > > > > Won't the check falsely be bypassed if the region overlaps SYSTEM_RAM > > and `no-map` memory? > > Just discussed this with Yidi Lin. > It seems that 'no-map' region will be marked as IORESOURCE_MEM instead > of undefined memory holes > (See arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c:request_standard_resources). If a cbmem > entry contains a real memory > hole, it is likely a coreboot bug. I see. Please rephrase the commit message and code comment to be clear. E.g.: 1. On ARM64, no-map regions are filtered out as they are IORESOURCE_MEM (See arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c:request_standard_resources). 2. On X86, standard reserved regions (IORES_DESC_RESERVED) ... 3. Mixed regions containing holes are safely skipped. Remove it as this is inaccurate (the patch can't skip holes).