Re: [PATCH v10 06/27] ima: Move arch_policy_entry into ima_namespace

Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.containers,org.kernel.vger.linux-integrity,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2/16/22 15:56, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 15:48 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> On 2/16/22 11:39, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2022-02-01 at 15:37 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote
>>>
>>> Let's update the patch description providing a bit more background
>>> info:
>>>
>>> The archictecture specific policy rules, currently defined for EFI and
>>> powerpc, require the kexec kernel image and kernel modules to be
>>> validly signed and measured, based on the system's secure boot and/or
>>> trusted boot mode and the IMA_ARCH_POLICY Kconfig option being enabled.
>>>
>>>> Move the arch_policy_entry pointer into ima_namespace.
>>> Perhaps include something about namespaces being allowed or not allowed
>>> to kexec a new kernel or load kernel modules.
>> Namespaces are not allowed to kexec but special-casing the init_ima_ns
>> in the code to handle namespaces differently makes it much harder to
>> read the code. I would avoid special-casing init_ima_ns as much as
>> possible and therefore I have moved the arch_policy_entry into the
>> ima_namespace.
> Please include this in the patch description, but re-write the last
> line in the 3rd person, like:
>
> To avoid special-casing init_ima_ns, as much as possible, move the
> arch_policy_entry into the ima_namespace.

I took the paragraph on the background as well as this sentence.


>
> thanks,
>
> Mimi
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.