Re: [PATCH v14 00/26] ima: Namespace IMA with audit support in IMA-ns
Stefan Berger <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Sep 2022 06:54:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.containers,org.kernel.vger.linux-integrity,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/15/22 20:56, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 9/15/2022 12:31 PM, Stefan Berger wrote: >> The goal of this series of patches is to start with the namespacing of >> IMA and support auditing within an IMA namespace (IMA-ns) as the first >> step. >> >> In this series the IMA namespace is piggybacking on the user namespace >> and therefore an IMA namespace is created when a user namespace is >> created, although this is done late when SecurityFS is mounted inside >> a user namespace. The advantage of piggybacking on the user namespace >> is that the user namespace can provide the keys infrastructure that IMA >> appraisal support will need later on. >> >> We chose the goal of supporting auditing within an IMA namespace since it >> requires the least changes to IMA. Following this series, auditing within >> an IMA namespace can be activated by a root running the following lines >> that rely on a statically linked busybox to be installed on the host for >> execution within the minimal container environment: >> >> As root (since audit rules may now only be set by root): > > How about calling out the required capabilities? You don't need > to be root, you need a specific set of capabilities. It would be > very useful for the purposes of understanding the security value > of the patch set to know this. > CAP_AUDIT_WRITE?