Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] exec: inherit HWCAPs from the parent process

Andrei Vagin <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:29:00 -0800
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.criu,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <CANaxB-wNJWhyM7JUKT3y0Wp73=+8XZRnSkdudxqDwEo2FaJpwQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 10:01 AM Andrei Vagin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This patch series introduces a mechanism to inherit hardware capabilities
> (AT_HWCAP, AT_HWCAP2, etc.) from a parent process when they have been
> modified via prctl.
>
> To support C/R operations (snapshots, live migration) in heterogeneous
> clusters, we must ensure that processes utilize CPU features available
> on all potential target nodes. To solve this, we need to advertise a
> common feature set across the cluster.
>
> Initially, a cgroup-based approach was considered, but it was decided
> that inheriting HWCAPs from a parent process that has set its own
> auxiliary vector via prctl is a simpler and more flexible solution.
>
> This implementation adds a new mm flag MMF_USER_HWCAP, which is set when the
> auxiliary vector is modified via prctl(PR_SET_MM_AUXV). When execve() is
> called, if the current process has MMF_USER_HWCAP set, the HWCAP values are
> extracted from the current auxiliary vector and inherited by the new process.
>
> The first patch fixes AUXV size calculation for ELF_HWCAP3 and ELF_HWCAP4
> in binfmt_elf_fdpic and updates AT_VECTOR_SIZE_BASE.
>
> The second patch implements the core inheritance logic in execve().
>
> The third patch adds a selftest to verify that HWCAPs are correctly
> inherited across execve().
>
> v4: minor fixes based on feedback from the previous version.

Kees,

I think it is ready to be merged. Let me know if you have any other
comments/concerns/questions.

Thanks,
Andrei