Re: [PATCH 10/10] selftests/x86: Check restoring FPU state with larger xstate_size
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Jun 2026 17:12:18 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.criu,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJqdLrrWTyeyCVChomhYTx4=Bo7tO-cWV-7npnLBoWAO2gZ_UQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Am Mo., 15. Juni 2026 um 21:42 Uhr schrieb Andrei Vagin <[email protected]>: > > Add two new test cases to sigframe_fpu_portability.c: > > The first test case (test_larger_xstate_size) verifies that the kernel > can restore FPU state from a signal frame that has xstate_size larger > than the current task's fpstate->user_size, but the buffer doesn't > contain states of any unsupported features. This test case emulates a > case when a process is migrated from a newer cpu to an older cpu, but > the process doesn't use any unsupported features. > > The second test case (test_unsupported_xfeatures) verifies that the > kernel correctly rejects restoring FPU state from a signal frame if it > contains states of any unsupported features. > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <[email protected]> > --- > .../selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c > index 462219905303..b349efcf05c3 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/sigframe_fpu_portability.c > @@ -27,6 +27,14 @@ > * - test_insufficient_xstate_size: > * Verifies that the kernel rejects a frame if xstate_size is too small for > * the features enabled in xfeatures. > + * > + * - test_larger_xstate_size: > + * Verifies that the kernel restores state from a frame with xstate_size > + * larger than the current task's size, if no unsupported features are active. > + * > + * - test_unsupported_xfeatures: > + * Verifies that the kernel rejects a frame if it contains unsupported > + * features in the xsave header. > */ > > #define SIGFRAME_XSTATE_HDR_OFFSET 512 > @@ -203,15 +211,134 @@ static void test_insufficient_xstate_size(void) > clearhandler(SIGSEGV); > } > > +static char fpu_buffer[8192] __attribute__((aligned(64))); > +#define UNSUPPORTED_XFEATURE (1ULL<<62) > + > +static void __handle_larger_xstate_size(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ucp, bool mod_xhdr) > +{ > + ucontext_t *uc = ucp; > + void *fp = uc->uc_mcontext.fpregs; > + struct _fpx_sw_bytes *sw = get_fpx_sw_bytes(fp); > + size_t copy_size; > + uint64_t *ymmh_p, xfeatures; > + struct xsave_buffer *xbuf; > + > + if (sw->magic1 != FP_XSTATE_MAGIC1) { > + sig_print("magic1 is not valid\n"); > + return; > + } > + > + copy_size = sw->xstate_size; > + if (copy_size > sizeof(fpu_buffer)) { > + sig_print("fpu_buffer is too small\n"); > + return; > + } > + > + memset(fpu_buffer, 0, sizeof(fpu_buffer)); > + memcpy(fpu_buffer, fp, copy_size); > + > + xbuf = (struct xsave_buffer *)fpu_buffer; > + sw = get_fpx_sw_bytes(fpu_buffer); > + > + sw->xstate_size += 64; > + sw->extended_size += 64; > + xfeatures = get_fpx_sw_bytes_features(xbuf); > + set_fpx_sw_bytes_features(fpu_buffer, xfeatures | UNSUPPORTED_XFEATURE); > + > + *(uint32_t *)((char *)fpu_buffer + sw->xstate_size) = FP_XSTATE_MAGIC2; > + > + if (mod_xhdr) { > + xfeatures = get_xstatebv(xbuf); > + set_xstatebv(xbuf, xfeatures | UNSUPPORTED_XFEATURE); > + } > + > + ymmh_p = (uint64_t *)(fpu_buffer + ymm_offset); > + ymmh_p[0] = TEST_YMMH_VAL; > + ymmh_p[1] = TEST_YMMH_VAL + 1; > + > + /* Update fpregs to point to the new buffer */ > + uc->uc_mcontext.fpregs = (fpregset_t)fpu_buffer; > +} > + > +static void handle_larger_xstate_size(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ucp) > +{ > + __handle_larger_xstate_size(sig, si, ucp, false); > +} > + > +static void test_larger_xstate_size(void) > +{ > + uint64_t v[4] = {0, 0, 0, 0}; > + > + sig_err_buf[0] = 0; > + sethandler(SIGUSR1, handle_larger_xstate_size, 0); > + > + v[0] = 0x1111111111111111ULL; > + v[1] = 0x2222222222222222ULL; > + v[2] = 0x3333333333333333ULL; > + v[3] = 0x4444444444444444ULL; > + write_ymm0(v); > + > + raise(SIGUSR1); > + v[0] = v[1] = v[2] = v[3] = 0; > + read_ymm0(v); > + > + if (sig_err_buf[0]) > + ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", sig_err_buf); > + else if (v[2] == TEST_YMMH_VAL && v[3] == TEST_YMMH_VAL + 1) > + ksft_test_result_pass("YMM state restored correctly with larger xstate_size\n"); > + else > + ksft_test_result_fail( > + "Got upper bits: 0x%lx 0x%lx (expected %lx %lx)\n", > + v[2], v[3], TEST_YMMH_VAL, TEST_YMMH_VAL + 1); > + > + clearhandler(SIGUSR1); > +} > + > +static void handle_unsupported_xfeatures(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *ucp) > +{ > + __handle_larger_xstate_size(sig, si, ucp, true); > +} > + > +static void test_unsupported_xfeatures(void) > +{ > + uint64_t v[4] = {0, 0, 0, 0}; > + > + sig_err_buf[0] = 0; > + > + sethandler(SIGUSR1, handle_unsupported_xfeatures, 0); > + sethandler(SIGSEGV, handle_segv, 0); > + > + v[0] = 0x1111111111111111ULL; > + v[1] = 0x2222222222222222ULL; > + v[2] = 0x3333333333333333ULL; > + v[3] = 0x4444444444444444ULL; > + write_ymm0(v); > + > + if (sigsetjmp(segv_jmpbuf, 1) == 0) { > + raise(SIGUSR1); > + sig_print("raise(SIGUSR1) returned (expected SIGSEGV)\n"); > + } > + > + clearhandler(SIGUSR1); > + clearhandler(SIGSEGV); > + > + if (sig_err_buf[0]) > + ksft_test_result_fail("%s\n", sig_err_buf); > + else > + ksft_test_result_pass("Unsupported feature in xsave header triggered SIGSEGV\n"); > +} > + > int main(void) > { > ksft_print_header(); > - ksft_set_plan(2); > + ksft_set_plan(4); > > check_avx_support(); > > test_shrunk_xstate_size(); > test_insufficient_xstate_size(); > + test_larger_xstate_size(); > + test_unsupported_xfeatures(); > > ksft_finished(); > return 0; > -- > 2.54.0.1189.g8c84645362-goog > >