Re: Looking for confirmation as I enter the acceptance stage.
Michael Kjörling <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Jul 2023 18:17:28 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.cryptsetup |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 24 Jul 2023 16:03 +0000, from [email protected] (Michael Kjörling): > I think that there actually just MIGHT be some hope for you. No > guarantees, but certainly to the point of "don't give up JUST yet". Well, this is a bit of a bummer. I did some more testing, and I can't seem to get cryptsetup to accept the "lukskey" you sent earlier as a key file for an extended version of the container starting with the header I was able to extract. This doesn't _have_ to be a showstopper; it's possible that LUKS simply needs data that's outside of what you've sent, or maybe you've been using that file differently. (And please think thrice before sending more; remember, anyone who has a valid key slot passphrase to a header has access to the plain text data of the container if they can get their hands on the ciphertext data, and this mailing list _is_ publicly archived. Absolutely do consider that key file compromised, possibly alongside your other, memorized passphrase for the container.) But it's somewhat of a downer. I would still say you have some chance when doing it with more data, though, so what I suggested previously is absolutely still worth trying. After all, the extraction I did left only 19823 bytes including the header signature at the start, which is plenty less than the canonical size of the full LUKS 1 header. -- Michael Kjörling 🔗 https://michael.kjorling.se “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”