Re: [feature] PQC KEM

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 18:42:03 CEST, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 6/29/26 6:27 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > Interested in introducing a new LUKS2 "xwing" keyslot type unlocked by an X-Wing
> > post-quantum hybrid KEM (ML-KEM-768 + X25519, draft-connolly-cfrg-xwing-kem)
> > instead of a passphrase to encrypt the kek (volume key)?
> > 
> > 1) asymmetric model won't shine in single user case but will be attractive in multiple user/image enrollment cases.
> > 2) if per-device fresh wrapping key is desired
> > 
> > 
> > I've implemented such keyslot type and tested.  But don't know if the aforementioned two cases is worth discussion.
> 
> This is typically something that should be done through LUKS2 external token while keeping keyslot
> encryption as it is defined in LUKS. (Maybe you did it that way, no idea.)
> 
> Anyway, what security issue this solves (except "it is PQC")?

That seems to be the key question. 

Also refer to https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/bollocks.pdf

Arno

-- 
Arno Wagner,     Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform.,    Email: [email protected]
GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718  FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF  B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718
----
A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier