Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/damon/ops-common: factor out damon_putback_folio_list()
[email protected] Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:07:07 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.damon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Low] Removal of the `struct folio *folio;` local variable declaration causes a build failure. -- --- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/damon/ops-common: factor out damon_putback_folio_list() --- commit 44363c3cc00338e3c3445bc5730a2655a4c0fded Author: liyouhong <[email protected]> mm/damon/ops-common: factor out damon_putback_folio_list() This patch factors out the duplicated folio putback loop from damon_migrate_folio_list() and damon_migrate_pages() into a new helper function, damon_putback_folio_list(). > diff --git a/mm/damon/ops-common.c b/mm/damon/ops-common.c > index 0981a5e3af172..4b99c31122d6d 100644 > --- a/mm/damon/ops-common.c > +++ b/mm/damon/ops-common.c [ ... ] > @@ -330,12 +330,22 @@ static unsigned int __damon_migrate_folio_list( [ ... ] > static unsigned int damon_migrate_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, > struct pglist_data *pgdat, > int target_nid) > { > unsigned int nr_migrated = 0; > - struct folio *folio; [Severity: Low] Does removing this declaration result in a build failure? The folio variable appears to still be used in damon_migrate_folio_list() during the initial loop over folio_list: while (!list_empty(folio_list)) { cond_resched(); folio = lru_to_folio(folio_list); list_del(&folio->lru); ... > LIST_HEAD(ret_folios); > LIST_HEAD(migrate_folios); -- Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=2