Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/17] mm/damon/sysfs: implement preps directory
SJ Park <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:54:22 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.damon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 17:46:08 +0000 [email protected] wrote: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: > - [Low] The kobj_type structure `damon_sysfs_preps_ktype` is missing the `static` keyword. > -- > > --- Patch [9]: [RFC PATCH v2 09/17] mm/damon/sysfs: implement preps directory --- > commit 8155aac7530c47520c4a221fb588dbd6e53e3875 > Author: SJ Park <[email protected]> > > mm/damon/sysfs: implement preps directory > > This commit implements a sysfs directory and a file for setting DAMON probe > preps. It introduces the preparatory data structures and functions without > actually generating the directories yet. > > > diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs.c b/mm/damon/sysfs.c > > index 50ff1c172d746..bf65e87fcb521 100644 > > --- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c > > +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c > > [ ... ] > > > @@ -750,6 +750,74 @@ static const struct kobj_type damon_sysfs_intervals_ktype = { > > .default_groups = damon_sysfs_intervals_groups, > > }; > > > > [ ... ] > > > +static struct attribute *damon_sysfs_preps_attrs[] = { > > + &damon_sysfs_preps_nr_attr.attr, > > + NULL, > > +}; > > +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(damon_sysfs_preps); > > + > > +const struct kobj_type damon_sysfs_preps_ktype = { > [Severity: Low] > Does this inadvertently expose damon_sysfs_preps_ktype to the global > namespace? > > It looks like the static keyword is missing on the definition of > damon_sysfs_preps_ktype, which will cause it to be globally visible and may > trigger static analysis warnings. This is an intended thing, for not causing build warning, while splitting change in reviewable size. > > > + .release = damon_sysfs_preps_release, > > + .sysfs_ops = &kobj_sysfs_ops, > > + .default_groups = damon_sysfs_preps_groups, > > +}; > > + > > /* > > * filter directory > > */ > > -- > Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=9 Thanks, SJ