Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/17] mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe prep directory
SJ Park <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Jul 2026 12:42:09 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.damon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:57:15 -0700 SJ Park <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 17:47:43 +0000 [email protected] wrote: > > > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider: > > - [Low] Missing `static` qualifier for `damon_sysfs_prep_ktype`. > > - [Low] The `name` field in `struct damon_sysfs_prep_action_name` is declared as a non-const `char *` but initialized with read-only string literals. > > -- > > > > --- Patch [11]: [RFC PATCH v2 11/17] mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe prep directory --- > > commit ec46e0d8618f958d1edbf7e0edacd883d4e30bde > > Author: SJ Park <[email protected]> > > > > mm/damon/sysfs: implement probe prep directory > > > > This commit implements the DAMON sysfs directory and files for specifying each > > probe prep action. It introduces the preparatory data structures and functions, > > though the files are not yet created under sysfs. > > > > > diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs.c b/mm/damon/sysfs.c > > > index 38affef08d0fb..a33423d997f59 100644 > > > --- a/mm/damon/sysfs.c > > > +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs.c > > > @@ -750,6 +750,89 @@ static const struct kobj_type damon_sysfs_intervals_ktype = { > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > +struct damon_sysfs_prep_action_name { > > > + enum damon_prep_action action; > > > + char *name; > > > > [Severity: Low] > > This isn't a bug, but should this field be a const char * instead of > > char *? The damon_sysfs_prep_action_names array initializes it with > > read-only string literals like "set_pgidle". > > Good suggestion. I will constify both fields. > > > > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static const struct damon_sysfs_prep_action_name > > > +damon_sysfs_prep_action_names[] = { > > > + { > > > + .action = DAMON_PREP_SET_PGIDLE, > > > + .name = "set_pgidle", > > > + }, > > > +}; > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > +static struct attribute *damon_sysfs_prep_attrs[] = { > > > + &damon_sysfs_prep_prep_action_attr.attr, > > > + NULL, > > > +}; > > > +ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(damon_sysfs_prep); > > > + > > > +const struct kobj_type damon_sysfs_prep_ktype = { > > > > [Severity: Low] > > This isn't a bug, but is the static qualifier missing here? Without it, > > damon_sysfs_prep_ktype is exported globally which might trigger build > > warnings like -Wmissing-prototypes when compiling with W=1. > > It didn't warn on my setup. Let me think more... I still cannot make the warning on my setup. But the theory makes sense. I will fix this by changing the patch sequence. > > > > > > + .release = damon_sysfs_prep_release, > > > + .sysfs_ops = &kobj_sysfs_ops, > > > + .default_groups = damon_sysfs_prep_groups, > > > +}; > > > > -- > > Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=11 > > > Thanks, > SJ > Thanks, SJ