Re: [RFC PATCH v2.2 05/17] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_prep struct
[email protected] Tue, 28 Jul 2026 04:25:18 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.damon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] The newly introduced `preps` list in `struct damon_probe` is not synchronized during `damon_commit_probes()`. - [Medium] Missing public API to remove or destroy individual `damon_prep` instances dynamically. -- --- Patch [5]: [RFC PATCH v2.2 05/17] mm/damon/core: introduce damon_prep struct --- commit d7a749334ed0e3303b955b00673d30f87ca5091c Author: SJ Park <[email protected]> mm/damon/core: introduce damon_prep struct Some DAMON probe filter types require preparatory actions to operate effectively, such as setting the PG_Idle flag at a specific time. This commit introduces a new data type called damon_prep to specify these preparation actions for each probe. DAMON will execute the action for each region per sampling interval. > diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h > index a8bb9ee6979e3..1a8de735f955b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/damon.h > +++ b/include/linux/damon.h [ ... ] > @@ -780,6 +801,8 @@ struct damon_filter { > struct damon_probe { > unsigned int weight; > /* private: */ > + /* Preparation actions to apply to each probing memory. */ > + struct list_head preps; > /* Filters for assessing if a given region is for this probe. */ > struct list_head filters; > /* Siblings list. */ [Severity: Medium] Will this preps list be synchronized when a DAMON context is updated or cloned? Looking at damon_commit_probes() in mm/damon/core.c, it only seems to copy the weight and filters from the source probe to the destination probe: mm/damon/core.c:damon_commit_probes() { ... if (src_probe) { dst_probe->weight = src_probe->weight; err = damon_commit_filters(dst_probe, src_probe); if (err) return err; } else { damon_destroy_probe(dst_probe); } ... } It appears there is no logic to copy the new preps list. Could this leave the running context's preparation actions out of sync and silently discard configurations when damon_commit_ctx() is called? > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c > index 644daf5a16560..0b396c2456d05 100644 > --- a/mm/damon/core.c > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c [ ... ] > @@ -111,6 +111,28 @@ int damon_select_ops(struct damon_ctx *ctx, enum damon_ops_id id) > return err; > } > > +struct damon_prep *damon_new_prep(enum damon_prep_action action) > +{ > + struct damon_prep *prep; > + > + prep = kmalloc_obj(*prep); > + if (!prep) > + return NULL; > + prep->action = action; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&prep->list); > + return prep; > +} > + > +void damon_add_prep(struct damon_probe *p, struct damon_prep *prep) > +{ > + list_add_tail(&prep->list, &p->preps); > +} > + > +static void damon_free_prep(struct damon_prep *p) > +{ > + kfree(p); > +} [Severity: Medium] Should there be a public API to remove or destroy individual damon_prep instances dynamically? Since damon_add_prep() is provided to dynamically add preparation actions to a probe, it seems there might be a need for a corresponding damon_destroy_prep() or damon_del_prep(). Without exporting such functions and with damon_free_prep() restricted to static scope, is there a way for API consumers to dynamically remove or free a prep without destroying the entire probe? -- Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=5