Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/damon: skip deactivated schemes in watermark checks and add fallback sleep

SJ Park <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.damon,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat,  8 Aug 2026 00:18:40 +0800 Liew Rui Yan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi SJ,
> 
> On Fri,  7 Aug 2026 07:07:39 -0700 SJ Park <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > This is an intended implementation.
> > 
> > When all schemes are deactivated by watermarks, DAMON stops monitoring.  It was
> > implemented in the way because we didn't want DAMON consumes system resource in
> > the case.  But, later it turned out DAMON's resource consumption is really
> > negligible.  Rather, it is turned out that it makes DAMON runs with stale
> > history when it is activated again.  Particularly, regions have 'age' and their
> > start/end addresses that was emerged before the deactivation.  Those are
> > meaningless and could even cause wrong DAMOS decisions.
> > 
> > We don't want that anymore.  For a case the user really want DAMON completely
> > stops, we introduced 'pause'.  For max_nr_snapshot-based deactivation, we don't
> > intend to completely stop DAMON.
> > 
> > Maybe the documentation can be updated to further clarify this.
> 
> Thank you for your detailed explanation! I also glad to hear that
> DAMON's monitoring's resource consumption is negligible, since I plan to
> add a contexts/<N>/always_monitoring parameter later on, allowing users
> to decide for themselves whether to keep monitoring even all schemes is
> deactivated by watermarks.

Unless it is for your real use case, I'd not encourage improving watermarks.

Here are contexts.  Watermarks was initially developed for DAMON_RECLAIM.  But
I found it is difficult to be extended for other use cases.  Also it has the
aobve mentioned problem: losing the monitoring results that was converged over
time.

I'm planning to develop an alternative superior feature and deprecate
watermarks over time.  The plan is not having a high priority because I don't
show real requirement of that.  If anyone wants it for their real use case,
please let me know so that I can prioritize.


Thanks,
SJ

[...]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.