Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The patch introduces an inconsistent state in the `damon_ctx` API by initializing `call_controls_obsolete` to true while leaving its identically-designed sibling field `walk_control_obsolete` as false.
--
--- Patch [2]: [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/damon/core: set ctx->call_controls_obsolete in damon_new_ctx() ---
commit 94c12d6bfcca8f83b408960a36d0c0a8519d80c7
Author: SJ Park <[email protected]>
mm/damon/core: set ctx->call_controls_obsolete in damon_new_ctx()
This commit addresses an issue where passing an unstarted DAMON context
to damon_call() can cause an indefinite hang. It fixes this by initializing
ctx->call_controls_obsolete to true in damon_new_ctx().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c
> index af7b77710745d..5080cb12220d2 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
> @@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ struct damon_ctx *damon_new_ctx(void)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->adaptive_targets);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->schemes);
>
> + ctx->call_controls_obsolete = true;
[Severity: Medium]
Should ctx->walk_control_obsolete also be initialized to true here?
Because walk_control_obsolete is zero-initialized to false during allocation,
an unstarted context passed to damos_walk() will bypass the obsolete check:
mm/damon/core.c:damos_walk() {
...
if (ctx->walk_control_obsolete) {
mutex_unlock(&ctx->walk_control_lock);
return -ECANCELED;
}
...
}
This appears to leave damos_walk() vulnerable to the exact same indefinite
wait_for_completion() hang on unstarted contexts that this patch resolves for
damon_call().
Does it make sense to update walk_control_obsolete alongside
call_controls_obsolete to ensure the API behaves consistently?
> prandom_seed_state(&ctx->rnd_state, get_random_u64());
>
> return ctx;
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=2
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.