Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation
SJ Park <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.damon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 04:01:40 +0000 [email protected] wrote: > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: > > Pre-existing issues: > - [High] Concurrent invocation of `damon_call()` during kthread startup leads to an infinite kernel loop. > -- > > --- Patch [3]: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation --- > commit 07f6c5438f6069b0b8225e26e3726d6aa4e3da09 > Author: SJ Park <[email protected]> > > mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation > > DAMON_RECLAIM avoids passing NULL or unstarted damon_ctx to damon_call() > with its own validation. The validation is no longer needed, because > the DAMON core layer now handles the corner cases itself. Remove the > unnecessary check. > > > diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c > > index 45d5557cc575a..42a2c9cb13431 100644 > > --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c > > +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c > [ ... ] > > @@ -293,10 +291,6 @@ static int damon_reclaim_commit_inputs_store(const char *val, > > if (!commit_inputs_request) > > return 0; > > > > - /* Skip damon_call() if ctx has not successfully started. */ > > - if (!damon_reclaim_damon_has_started) > > - return -EINVAL; > > - > > [Severity: High] > This is a pre-existing issue, but does removing this validation expose an > infinite loop in the DAMON core? > > If userspace writes to this sysfs file concurrently with damon_start(), > damon_call() in mm/damon/core.c can hit a race condition. The core > initializes ctx->call_controls_obsolete to true. If damon_call() runs > before the kthread fully starts, it can read call_controls_obsolete == true > and jump to the canceled label: > > mm/damon/core.c:damon_call() { > ... > if (ctx->call_controls_obsolete) { > mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock); > goto canceled; > } > ... > canceled: > while (damon_is_running(ctx)) > schedule_timeout_idle(msecs_to_jiffies(100)); > return -ECANCELED; > } > > If damon_start() concurrently sets ctx->kdamond to non-NULL, > damon_is_running(ctx) becomes true. Because the kthread has just started, > it runs indefinitely, and damon_call() gets trapped in the while loop > forever. Because of the param_lock, that race is impossible. > > > err = damon_call(ctx, &control); > > > > return err ? err : control.return_code; > > -- > Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=3 Thanks, SJ