Re: [diamon-discuss] [RELEASE] LTTng-modules 2.9.11, 2.10.8, 2.11.0-rc2 (Linux kernel tracer)
Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:13:56 -0400
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.diamon-discuss,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.lttng.lists.lttng-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:41:22 -0400 Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> wrote: > Also does it also make sense for lttng ring buffer to use the ftrace code for > ring buffer, or make the ftrace ring buffer better and have lttng use it? Or > is the lttng ring buffer design too radically different? We tried in the past and never actually got something that we both could agree on. Now I believe the user space tools depend on the way each one is, so to change one will break the tools that read it. -- Steve