Re: [diamon-discuss] My experience on perf, CTF and TraceCompass, and some suggection.
Alexandre Montplaisir <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:12:27 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.diamon-discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 01/23/2015 04:35 AM, Wang Nan wrote: > [...] I prefer to use: > > # perf record -a -e sched:* -e syscalls:* sleep 1 > > However there are some bugs and I have to make some patches. They are > posted and being disscussed currently, those bugs are still exist > upstream. Hmm, I can confirm this problem, when trying to convert a trace taken with these events enabled, I get the following error: Failed to add field 'nr Failed to add event 'syscalls:sys_enter_io_submit'. Good to know it's being looked at! But when you say: > TraceCompass doesn't recognize syscall:* tracepoints as CPU status > changing point. I have to also catch raw_syscall:*, and which doubles > the number of samples. I assume this was that with your patches applied, so that you could take a trace of the syscall:* tracepoints? Do you have a link to those patches somewhere? Or just let us know when it gets integrated upstream. I was trying to update the analysis in Trace Compass to handle syscall:* too, but we can't really do it without knowing how it will look like in CTF format ;) Cheers, Alexandre