Re: [diamon-discuss] Diamon Meeting on Tuesday February 9th, 2016, at 11h EDT (15h UTC)
Julien Desfossez <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:22:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.diamon-discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20160216212200.GG6594@sinkpad> |
Mike confirmed to me that the recording did not work, so I am annotating the slides to add a little bit more context and I will send them very soon. Julien On 16-Feb-2016 09:15:28 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi Martin, > > We are trying to clarify with Mike Dolan whether the recording > feature of the conference system was working or not during the > call. As far as I can see, it did not appear to have worked, > even though the option was enabled in the conference system. :-( > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > ----- On Feb 4, 2016, at 4:31 AM, Oberhuber, Martin [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > This looks like a very interesting approach and I've read the Blog, > > but unfortunately I can't make the 9th. > > > > I don't think I would have much to contribute, but I am certainly > > interested in what others say. Could the session be recorded, or > > meeting notes posted? - Otherwise I'd be available from the 15th on, > > in case you'd consider moving the session. > > > > Two questions came up for me when reading the blog, > > > > 1. Julien writes "We are not trying to solve a problem related to the > > interrupts > > being masked for too long (ftrace already has some tools to help with that)." > > Which are those tools? Any pointer would be appreciated. > > > > 2. I really like the general usefulness of the latency_tracker and the many > > clever > > ways it can be configured / leveraged - but it feels like an expert tool to me, > > where you'd very clearly have to know what you're doing. Are there any ideas > > making such expert tools more usable and discoverable by general users ? > > > > Many thanks, > > Martin > > -- > > Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind River > > direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathieu > > Desnoyers > > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 9:09 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [diamon-discuss] Diamon Meeting on Tuesday February 9th, 2016, at 11h > > EDT (15h UTC) > > > > Hi, > > > > Following the blog post published two weeks ago [1], we would like to propose > > organizing a phone meeting with all interested members of this workgroup on > > February 9th to gather feedback and ideas for improvement on the subject of > > measuring and detecting high response time. > > > > At EfficiOS, we have developed a kernel module for monitoring at run-time the > > delay between the moment the kernel starts processing an interrupt > > (do_IRQ) and the moment the target task gets scheduled in or has finished > > processing the data. > > > > When a high latency is detected, it emits a tracepoint event and can wakeup a > > user-space script to take arbitrary actions as soon as possible. > > > > The main intent is to provide an entry point in a kernel trace. After that, > > everyone has their own methodology to process the trace. The blog post > > illustrates what we can do with LTTng as an example but the detection and > > triggers are not coupled with any tracer. > > > > The proposed agenda is a discussion around these points: > > - presentation of the scope of the problem > > - limitation of the current tools > > - overview of the latency_tracker module applied for this use-case > > -- current state > > -- use-cases > > -- future plans > > - from the audience: comments, ideas, other approaches, etc. > > > > If you have other points you would like to discuss around this subject, please > > let me know and I will add them. > > > > Also, if you wish to attend but can't make it at the proposed date and time, let > > us know. > > > > The details for the conference call will be sent soon. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Julien & Mathieu > > > > [1] https://lttng.org/blog/2016/01/06/monitoring-realtime-latencies/ > > > > -- > > Mathieu Desnoyers > > EfficiOS Inc. > > http://www.efficios.com > > _______________________________________________ > > diamon-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/diamon-discuss > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com > _______________________________________________ > diamon-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/diamon-discuss