Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition
Khem Raj <[email protected]> Thu, 5 Sep 2024 09:39:12 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.distributions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMKF1sqS7geN+RvUSWEbcgEjkawoMk9JcSsfSar-8DamZzNJJw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 6:51=E2=80=AFAM Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@gentoo= .org> wrote: > > > > > FWIW, yocto/openembedded have also done the same and offered a distro > > setting to the users > > to select 32bit time_t if they wished to but defaulted to 64bit time_t. > > In case of Openembedded, which (as far as I understand) mostly offers > complete system images for download or build, I might have done that > similarly at the start - this is a different situation. OpenEmbedded and Gentoo are alike in some respects, they are source based distributions with some pre-builts, I thought it must be easier for gentoo compared to binary distros. > > That said, nothing would keep you from trivially still switching the CHOS= T > in case of enabled 64bit time_t, to be able to keep the two variants apar= t. > it does have impact on OE when packages ( configure ) start depending upon these new tuples for enabled/disabling stuff. > -- > Andreas K. H=C3=BCttel > [email protected] > Gentoo Linux developer > (council, comrel, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge