Re: Proposed CHOST change for the 64bit time_t transition
Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]> Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:52:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.distributions |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gentoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bruno Haible <[email protected]> writes: > Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 wrote: >> An alternative that I pondered was to teach the linker about some notion >> of "compatibility strings" that it would compare and reject if >> different, plus teaching the compiler how to emit those, plus teaching >> glibc to tell the compiler to emit those.. We could have key-value >> pairs in some section. For each key K, we could have the linker check >> that, for each (shared or otherwise) object either does not contain K or >> contains K with the same value as all the other ones, and produce an >> error otherwise. On the resulting object, the KV pairs would be the >> union of all KV pairs of all constituent objects. > > This sounds much like the arm eabi attributes: If a .s file does not > start with > .eabi_attribute 20, 1 > .eabi_attribute 21, 1 > .eabi_attribute 23, 3 > .eabi_attribute 24, 1 > .eabi_attribute 25, 1 > .eabi_attribute 26, 2 > .eabi_attribute 30, 2 > .eabi_attribute 34, 0 > .eabi_attribute 18, 4 > the resulting .o file cannot be linked with other .o files on the system. > > Is it a hassle even for packages that don't use time_t of off_t (such as > GNU libffcall or libffi). > > Yes, it would be useful to have a way to have the linker warn if a binary > that depends on 32-bit time_t and a binary that depends on 64-bit time_t > get linked together. But PLEASE implement this in a way that is a no-op > when time_t is not used by either of the two binaries. I mentioned that a missing pair should not preclude linking. This is because what I imagined is somehow attaching this tag to the typedef for time_t, or such, so if the typedef is not used, no such tag is emitted. I'm not sure how feasible that is, I, of course, don't have a full implementation. =2D-=20 Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOcEARYKAI8WIQT+4rPRE/wAoxYtYGFSwpQwHqLEkwUCZtw+kV8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0RkVF MkIzRDExM0ZDMDBBMzE2MkQ2MDYxNTJDMjk0MzAxRUEyQzQ5MxEcYXJzZW5AZ2Vu dG9vLm9yZwAKCRBSwpQwHqLEk99pAQCKLodLpIQF5XrOTrvxS6zMlsJGZH14UEMK Ebm4xjitowEA+B3jHbb77fkhKT81ra3nUNzLlZ5nWWO5Ss+fFz90gAU= =3RYl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--