Re: recommending AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED ?
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Apr 2023 15:00:08 -0700
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.distributions |
|---|---|
| Organization | UCLA Computer Science Department |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2023-04-10 14:42, Bruno Haible wrote: > How about a middle ground between the two macros? A macro, say > AC_SYS_YEAR2038_UNLESS_OPT_OUT (*), that > - like AC_SYS_YEAR2038, has the option --disable-year2038, > - like AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED, fails if a large 'time_t' is > unavailable and --disable-year2038 was not specified. Even simpler, let's have just one new macro instead of two. I.e., let's change Autoconf to remove AC_SYS_YEAR2038_REQUIRED and to define instead a macro AC_SYS_YEAR2038_OPT_OUT that acts like AC_SYS_YEAR2038 except it errors out if wide time_t and --disable-year2038 are both missing. Then let's propagate this change into Gnulib, and rename Gnulib's year2030-required module to year2038-opt-out. Similarly for AC_SYS_LARGEFILE_REQUIRED. Since this is a change to Autoconf I'd like to hear Zack's opinion.