Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] multipath-tools: clarify path selector descriptions in multipath.conf.5
Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.dm-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/17/26 12:13 AM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 02:29:01PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: >> +Choose the path for the next I/O request by \fBcycling through the path groups\fR. > > This isn't a strong objections, but personally, I'm not sure "groups" > makes this better. It kind of sounds like paths are picked from multiple > path groups. Perhaps: > "cycling through the paths" > or > "cycling through the paths in the path group" > > I'm also o.k. with leaving it as you have it. You are absolutely right. Using the plural "groups" breaks the coherence of the sentence because I/O is cycled within the active path group, not between different groups. I'll restore the singular form in v3. Thanks