[PATCH] dm-integrity: fix the 'fix_hmac' option

Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:31:25 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.dm-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
When the "fix_hmac" argument is used, dm-integrity is supposed to check
the superblock with the journal_mac. However, there was a logic bug in
the code - the code only checked the superblock mac if the bit
SB_FLAG_FIXED_HMAC was set in the superblock. So, the attacker could
clear this bit and bypass the checking trivially.

This commit changes dm-integrity so that when the user specified the
"fix_hmac" flag and the superblock doesn't have the bit
SB_FLAG_FIXED_HMAC set, the activation is aborted with an error.

Unfortunatelly, there's a bug in the integritysetup tool that when using
the 'open' command it passes the "fix_hmac" argument to the kernel even
if the user specified --integrity-legacy-hmac. The bug will be fixed in
the upcoming 2.8.7 release.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Shukai Ni <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/md/dm-integrity.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c	2026-07-09 21:07:04.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c	2026-07-09 21:10:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -5128,6 +5128,20 @@ static int dm_integrity_ctr(struct dm_ta
 		ti->error = "Journal mac mismatch";
 		goto bad;
 	}
+	if (ic->fix_hmac && !(ic->sb->flags & cpu_to_le32(SB_FLAG_FIXED_HMAC)) && ic->journal_mac_alg.key_string) {
+		/*
+		 * If this happens, it may be either because someone tampered
+		 * with the device or it may be due to a bug in the
+		 * integritysetup tool.
+		 *
+		 * In the latter case, upgrade to integritysetup 2.8.7 and use
+		 * the argument --integrity-legacy-hmac when using the open
+		 * command.
+		 */
+		r = -EINVAL;
+		ti->error = "fix_hmac is on the command line but not in the superblock";
+		goto bad;
+	}
 
 	get_provided_data_sectors(ic);
 	if (!ic->provided_data_sectors) {