Re: [PATCH v4 01/14] dma-buf: introduce initial file I/O infrastructure

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:37:19AM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 7/29/26 07:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> The method name feels a bit convoluted, but given all the
>> previous discussions I don't care too strongly.  I'll leave
>> the dma-buf side review to those who understand it.
>
> I assume you mean this:

Yes.

>
> +	int (*init_dma_buf_io_ctx)(struct file *, struct dma_buf_io_ctx *);
>
> I agree, and all dma_buf_io_[ctx,map] look clunky, but I don't
> see what I can drop out of the name. Suggestions? Maybe I at least
> should make the fs op sth like "register_dma_buf".

I just remember scares from the last discussion :)

register_dma_buf sounds fine to be, but unless I misremember there
were objections to that before.

>
> -- 
> Pavel Begunkov
---end quoted text---