Re: [PATCH v4 14/14] io_uring/rsrc: add dmabuf backed registered buffers
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:45:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.io-uring,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-media |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/29/26 17:52, Anuj gupta wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 7:37 PM Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> +static int io_import_dmabuf(struct io_kiocb *req, >>>> + int ddir, struct iov_iter *iter, >>>> + struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu, >>>> + size_t len, size_t offset, >>>> + unsigned issue_flags) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct io_regbuf_dma *db = imu->priv; >>>> + struct dma_buf_io_map *map; >>>> + >>>> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER)) >>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP; >>>> + if (!len) >>>> + return -EFAULT; >>>> + if (req->file != db->target_file) >>>> + return -EBADF; >>>> + >>>> + if (req->flags & REQ_F_DROP_DMABUF) { >>>> + map = req->dmabuf_map; >>>> + goto init_iter; >>>> + } >>> >>> O_DIRECT is checked only during registration; we should recheck >>> (file->f_flags & O_DIRECT) per request. >> >> Nobody should be able to clear O_DIRECT, unless I missed something? >> And fwiw, io_uring wouldn't be the right place to do it. >> > > fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, flags & ~O_DIRECT) on an already registered, already > open fd succeeds. The consequence is that subsequent I/Os switch to Very exciting. > buffered I/O and cause silent data loss. Something on this path needs > to reject this combination. Yeah, I'll fix it, thanks -- Pavel Begunkov