Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment
Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:22:15 -0600
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/30/26 6:52 AM, Keith Busch wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 01:26:26PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 02:03:07PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: >>>>> Hi Jens, have you had a chance to look at this one yet? This addresses >>>>> previous issues with certain device mappers under direct io. >>>> >>>> I they look fine, but at this point we should toss them into 7.3. Yes >>>> I know there are regressions around this, but from 6.1x days. And the >>>> series doesn't apply to the current block-7.2 anyway. >>> >>> This series is kind of old at this point, but yes, it's not fixing a new >>> regression either. I'm okay if this goes to the next window, and I will >>> handle the stable follow-up. >> >> Honestly, I think that'a a reall bad idea. This is a regression in 6.18, >> and while it took a while for people to hit this with their a little >> more complicated lvm/md setups, it has stopped real systems from being >> used. We need to fix this ASAP. > > This should have gone in several weeks ago, IMO. You can most readily > hit a problem running qemu against one of those lvm setups. We're just > so late in this release cycle that I'm not pushing hard for 7.2, but I > would support that choice too. Exactly, it's been floating for a bit, and the last week is surely on me. But merging at the time it was posted would've been late for fairly substantial changes. Hence why I think 7.3 is just the better choice. We're talking weeks in difference on when it gets to stable anyway, which is what matters. -- Jens Axboe