Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/5] block: validate direct I/O memory alignment

Jens Axboe <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 10:22:15 -0600
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.regressions,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/30/26 6:52 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 01:26:26PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 02:03:07PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jens, have you had a chance to look at this one yet? This addresses
>>>>> previous issues with certain device mappers under direct io.
>>>>
>>>> I they look fine, but at this point we should toss them into 7.3. Yes
>>>> I know there are regressions around this, but from 6.1x days. And the
>>>> series doesn't apply to the current block-7.2 anyway.
>>>
>>> This series is kind of old at this point, but yes, it's not fixing a new
>>> regression either. I'm okay if this goes to the next window, and I will
>>> handle the stable follow-up.
>>
>> Honestly, I think that'a a reall bad idea.  This is a regression in 6.18,
>> and while it took a while for people to hit this with their a little
>> more complicated lvm/md setups, it has stopped real systems from being
>> used.  We need to fix this ASAP.
> 
> This should have gone in several weeks ago, IMO. You can most readily
> hit a problem running qemu against one of those lvm setups. We're just
> so late in this release cycle that I'm not pushing hard for 7.2, but I
> would support that choice too.

Exactly, it's been floating for a bit, and the last week is surely on
me. But merging at the time it was posted would've been late for fairly
substantial changes.

Hence why I think 7.3 is just the better choice. We're talking weeks in
difference on when it gets to stable anyway, which is what matters.

-- 
Jens Axboe