Re: [PATCH 03/26] loop: stop using loop_reconfigure_limits in __loop_clr_fd
Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.drbd-dev,dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.infradead.lists.linux-um,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-raid,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/11/24 2:19 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > __loop_clr_fd wants to clear all settings on the device. Prepare for > moving more settings into the block limits by open coding > loop_reconfigure_limits. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/block/loop.c | 10 +++++++++- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c > index 93780f41646b75..93a49c40a31a71 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/loop.c > +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c > @@ -1133,6 +1133,7 @@ static int loop_configure(struct loop_device *lo, blk_mode_t mode, > > static void __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release) > { > + struct queue_limits lim; > struct file *filp; > gfp_t gfp = lo->old_gfp_mask; > > @@ -1156,7 +1157,14 @@ static void __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release) > lo->lo_offset = 0; > lo->lo_sizelimit = 0; > memset(lo->lo_file_name, 0, LO_NAME_SIZE); > - loop_reconfigure_limits(lo, 512, false); > + > + /* reset the block size to the default */ > + lim = queue_limits_start_update(lo->lo_queue); > + lim.logical_block_size = 512; Nit: SECTOR_SIZE ? maybe ? > + lim.physical_block_size = 512; > + lim.io_min = 512; > + queue_limits_commit_update(lo->lo_queue, &lim); > + > invalidate_disk(lo->lo_disk); > loop_sysfs_exit(lo); > /* let user-space know about this change */ Otherwise, looks OK to me. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research