Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression

Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.drbd-dev,dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.oe-lkp,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.infradead.lists.linux-um,org.kernel.vger.ceph-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-raid,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
This is odd to say at least.  Any chance you can check the value
of /sys/block/$DEVICE/queue/rotational for the relevant device before
and after this commit?  And is this an ATA or NVMe SSD?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.