Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement

Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:32:07 -0700

Newsgroups	dev.linux.lists.drbd-dev,dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.oe-lkp,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.infradead.lists.linux-um,org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-raid,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Newsgroups

dev.linux.lists.drbd-dev,dev.linux.lists.dm-devel,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,dev.linux.lists.oe-lkp,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.infradead.lists.linux-nvme,org.infradead.lists.linux-um,org.kernel.vger.linux-bcache,org.kernel.vger.linux-block,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.kernel.vger.linux-raid,org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel

Message-ID

<[email protected]>

On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 04:22:19PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> from below, it seems the patchset doesn't introduce any performance improvement
> but a regression now. is this expected?

Not having the improvement at least alleviate my concerns about data
integrity.  I'm still curious where it comes from as it isn't exactly
expected.