Re: [PATCH 2/2] drbd: select CONFIG_NET_HANDSHAKE

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026, at 22:16, Christoph B=C3=B6hmwalder wrote:
> Am 18.03.26 um 11:48 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:

>>  config NET_HANDSHAKE_KUNIT_TEST
>>  	tristate "KUnit tests for the handshake upcall mechanism" if !KUNIT=
_ALL_TESTS
>
> Thanks for the fix, I applied it to our drbd-next tree (which should e=
nd
> up in linux-next).
>
> I would prefer to squash these kinds of fixups to keep the history in
> our patch series clean.
> Arnd, does that work for you? How do you prefer we handle attribution?
>
> Unfortunately I couldn't really find a clear precedence pattern for
> this, how is this usually handled?

Whichever way works best for you. Some people care a lot about=20
attribution for bugfixes, but I generally prefer a clean history
myself.

     Arnd