Re: [PATCH v2] arch_topology: Introduce nr_possible_packages
Sudeep Holla <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:32:03 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.driver-core,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260721-armored-lion-of-pluck-9fc8a0@sudeepholla> |
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 01:43:17PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote: > For multi-sockets platforms kernel or driver code may need the number > of packages to chose different code directions. Some architecture > already provides such kind of interface like x86, which is being used > in its architecture code and drivers. > > Add similar interface 'nr_possible_packages' for platforms which can > get package topology information by parsing ACPI tables in boot phase, > which was verified to show the correct number of packages on some > 1-socket and 2-sockets production arm64 servers from different vendors. > > It has been used locally by some arm64 PMU driver, and cross-socket > timer-consistency check code, which are to be posted. > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <[email protected]> > --- > since v1: > * fix the potential overflow issue for 32b package ID (Sudeep) > * add real use case in commit log (Sudeep) > > since RFC: > * use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL instead of EXPORT_SYMBOL (Greg) This is undone in this version, why ? > * change the possible max package ID to 2047 (Greg) > * remove the CONFIG_ARM64/RISCV limit for 'nr_possible_packages' (Greg) Again this is still there, misleading or v2 is back to RFC, /me confused. > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ Comments about users is still ignored. -- Regards, Sudeep P.S.: Please avoid personal pings as it will not gain attention from other interested parties.