Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH] uprobe: do not call populate_args() for pid probes

Kris Van Hees <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.dtrace
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 02:13:33AM -0400, Eugene Loh wrote:
> On 8/14/25 15:27, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 12:47:25PM -0400, Eugene Loh wrote:
> > > Reviewed-by: Eugene Loh <[email protected]>
> > > 
> > > FWIW, with every patch I wonder:  "Are there any test issues?" (Like, should
> > > we test something here?  Were we?  Etc.)  I assume in this particular case,
> > > problems were revealed by patch "Fix various memory leaks related to stapsdt
> > > and usdt probes" on tests
> > >      test/unittest/usdt/tst.pidargmap.sh
> > >      test/unittest/usdt/tst.pidargs.sh
> > >      test/unittest/usdt/tst.pidprobes.sh
> > > The present patch is simply to remediate those revealed problems. To me,
> > > that sort of information is useful in a commit message.
> > I can add that in the future, though personally I don't find that as valuable
> > because anyone would have run a test prior to this patch and after the patch,
> > would notice that anyway.
> > 
> > But if it makes it easier to assess a patch, etc then I can add that in the
> > future.
> 
> Cool, yes.  A person might run the full test suite before and after, but
> they might not.  Anyhow, it does make it easier to review the patch.
> 
> But the reason for this email is that I seem to be getting
>         test/unittest/usdt/tst.stapsdt-notes-args.sh: FAIL: expected results
> differ.
>         test/unittest/usdt/tst.stapsdt-notes-isenabled.sh: FAIL: expected
> results differ.
>         test/unittest/usdt/tst.stapsdt-notes-lib.sh: FAIL: expected results
> differ.
>         test/unittest/usdt/tst.stapsdt-notes.sh: FAIL: expected results
> differ.
> with this patch.

Oops - not sure how that passed on my system when testing.  Either way,
posting fix in a sec.
> 
> > > On 8/13/25 23:58, Kris Van Hees via DTrace-devel wrote:
> > > > Only USDT (regular and is-enabled) probes need populate_args().
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > >    libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c | 6 ++++--
> > > >    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c b/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
> > > > index c63d58383..605ae8397 100644
> > > > --- a/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
> > > > +++ b/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
> > > > @@ -994,8 +994,10 @@ static dt_probe_t *create_underlying(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp,
> > > >    		 */
> > > >    	}
> > > > -	if (populate_args(dtp, psp, upp) < 0)
> > > > -		goto fail;
> > > > +	if (upp->flags & (PP_IS_ENABLED | PP_IS_USDT)) {
> > > > +		if (populate_args(dtp, psp, upp) < 0)
> > > > +			goto fail;
> > > > +	}
> > > >    	return uprp;
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.