Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] bpf: allocate the buffers BPF map to fit highest CPU id
Kris Van Hees <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:19:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.dtrace |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aV5rcv/[email protected]> |
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 03:10:32PM -0500, Eugene Loh wrote: > Â Reviewed-by: Eugene Loh <[email protected]> Per your reporting on the 2/4 patch, and further testing, the array map needs to be created with size max_cpuid + 1 to accomodate the CPU with the highest id (max_cpuid). I made that change in the patch and it resolves the issues with tests. If you agree, I can just make that change in the patch, retain your R-b, and merge. Let me know... > On 12/17/25 00:10, Kris Van Hees wrote: > > Even when less than the possible number of CPUs are online, the 'buffers' > > BPF map should be allocated based on the highest possible CPU id because > > probe data is written to the bufer that corresponds to a given CPU id, > > which could be part of non-sequential CPU id configurations. > > > > The observed problem was on a system with 128 possible CPUs (0-127), but > > only CPUs 0-7,100-107 were online. The 'buffers' BPF map was created with > > space to hold 16 trace data buffers (one for each online CPU), and since it > > is an array map, this caused the trace buffers for CPUs 100-107 to fail to > > allocate buffers, which in turn caused any trace data generated for those > > CPUs never to get reported. Since 'buffers' is an array map accessed by > > CPU id, enough space must be allocated to accomodate the highest online > > CPU id. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <[email protected]> > > --- > > libdtrace/dt_bpf.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_bpf.c b/libdtrace/dt_bpf.c > > index 0a57b7d2..6568a572 100644 > > --- a/libdtrace/dt_bpf.c > > +++ b/libdtrace/dt_bpf.c > > @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ gmap_create_buffers(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp) > > { > > return create_gmap(dtp, "buffers", BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, > > sizeof(uint32_t), sizeof(uint32_t), > > - dtp->dt_conf.num_online_cpus); > > + dtp->dt_conf.max_cpuid); > > } > > /*