Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH] test: Account for readahead tracepoints
Kris Van Hees <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:11:00 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.dtrace |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 12:55:32PM +0000, Nick Alcock wrote: > On 22 Jan 2026, eugene loh uttered the following: > > > From: Eugene Loh <[email protected]> > > > > Some tests check for empty probe descriptions. In some cases, the tests > > relied on the absence of any read* modules. > > Argh! Sorry, this was my bug way back when. I don't know why I thought > this would work in the long term... > > > However, some kernels can have "readahead" tracepoints. Tests expecting > > no read* modules will therefore fail. > > > > Change these tests to ask for readfoo* modules to ensure that the probe > > descriptions will indeed find no probes. But this commit message surely needs fixing because "read*" surely refers to the tracepoint names and not to the module names. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock <[email protected]> > > -- > NULL && (void)