Re: Segmentation Fault in iwd with ell 0.68 Due to l_netlink_send()
Rajdeep Malakar <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Aug 2024 00:36:06 +0530
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.ell |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27/08/24 00:25, Rajdeep Malakar wrote: Hi Denis, > Hi Denis, > > On 27/08/24 00:16, Denis Kenzior wrote: >> Hi Rajdeep, >> >> On 8/26/24 1:14 PM, Rajdeep Malakar wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I’m encountering a segmentation fault in iwd after upgrading the ell >>> library from version 0.67 to 0.68. The issue seems to be related to >>> the l_netlink_send() function in the ell library. >> >> Thanks for the report. Do you have a backtrace you can share by any >> chance? >> >> Regards, >> -Deni > Unfortunately, the `libell.so` I have (from Arch's [extra-testing] repo) > wasn't compiled with debuginfo, so all the backtrace I have is: > > #0 0x00007ffff7f22de6 in l_netlink_send () from /usr/lib/libell.so.0 > #1 0x000055555556d53d in ?? () > #2 0x00005555555ae380 in ?? () > #3 0x00007ffff7f25b95 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libell.so.0 > #4 0x00007ffff7f203cb in ?? () from /usr/lib/libell.so.0 > #5 0x00007ffff7f20655 in l_main_iterate () from /usr/lib/libell.so.0 > #6 0x00007ffff7f20ace in l_main_run () from /usr/lib/libell.so.0 > #7 0x00007ffff7f223a4 in l_main_run_with_signal () from > /usr/lib/libell.so.0 > #8 0x000055555555fd13 in ?? () > #9 0x00007ffff7d0ee08 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 > #10 0x00007ffff7d0eecc in __libc_start_main () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 > #11 0x0000555555560575 in ?? () > > I will try to compile it with debuginfo and get the backtrace. > So, I compiled ell with a bit more info: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff7f3e17c in l_netlink_send (netlink=0x55555563bc60, message=0x12, function=0x0, user_data=0x555555651e50, destroy=0x10) at ell/netlink.c:413 413 if (unlikely(message->nest_level)) a bit more backtrace: #0 0x00007ffff7f3e17c in l_netlink_send (netlink=0x55555563bc60, message=0x12, function=0x0, user_data=0x555555651e50, destroy=0x10) at ell/netlink.c:413 #1 0x000055555556d53d in ?? () #2 0x00005555555ae380 in ?? () #3 0x00007ffff7f40014 in process_unicast (genl=<optimized out>, nlmsg=0x7fffffffc140) at ell/genl.c:860 #4 received_data (io=<optimized out>, user_data=0x55555563b8b0) at ell/genl.c:972 #5 0x00007ffff7f3c2ac in io_callback (fd=<optimized out>, events=1, user_data=0x55555563b800) at ell/io.c:105 #6 0x00007ffff7f3b495 in l_main_iterate (timeout=<optimized out>) at ell/main.c:461 #7 0x00007ffff7f3b55c in l_main_run () at ell/main.c:508 #8 l_main_run () at ell/main.c:490 #9 0x00007ffff7f3b77b in l_main_run_with_signal (callback=<optimized out>, user_data=0x0) at ell/main.c:630 #10 0x000055555555fd13 in ?? () #11 0x00007ffff7d0ae08 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #12 0x00007ffff7d0aecc in __libc_start_main () from /usr/lib/libc.so.6 #13 0x0000555555560575 in ?? () Let me know if you need more info. -- regards, rajdeep
OpenPGP_0x683BAD66E3C54C47.asc
(application/pgp-keys, 656 B)
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- xjMEZcjGsRYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAFsHHQM5yuUKpk2zn4THdaG8ksYhWtxJLNCWB yeI7TM3NKFJhamRlZXAgTWFsYWthciA8cmFqZGVlcG0uZGV2QGdtYWlsLmNvbT7C kwQTFgoAOxYhBJmHhd9oeyQWbbGxsmg7rWbjxUxHBQJlyMaxAhsDBQsJCAcCAiIC BhUKCQgLAgQWAgMBAh4HAheAAAoJEGg7rWbjxUxHmLoA/RpBa2fiVQlIrqsoFly8 azNBvU7sI4nrbQ2KSXYbd+mxAQCbzGxNzoS1zJ4+kvzo99jcjg9lHNj6jy3DwAsm LXDRDM44BGXIxrESCisGAQQBl1UBBQEBB0CS16zlts9v9wjePBnusFUxAdhQES84 wRxNQdWAbxEeIAMBCAfCeAQYFgoAIBYhBJmHhd9oeyQWbbGxsmg7rWbjxUxHBQJl yMaxAhsMAAoJEGg7rWbjxUxHR4UA/1Y0V+zoQzjgIcFbS6XLM2GPVzSoqrMzhTDw uydE62XUAQD1p0mO6aEZmD5UPGOApCj76fnqZPicxtsVVgIbbBBqDw== =4uUH -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wnsEABYIACMWIQSZh4XfaHskFm2xsbJoO61m48VMRwUCZszSHgUDAAAAAAAKCRBoO61m48VMR6FA AP9ZdT/1ZKthLPxIS8T8I4wsaAIXkrQ9ZxYfcVpQ6qcNPwEAzmFb/rStu4+kSQwyifylLv1byGJN 7PFbWrRnVvbJuAE= =umbX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----