Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] treewide: run internal library tests in "make check"

David Timber <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.exfat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/21/26 16:02, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>> index ab6fb5d..99bad24 100644
>> --- a/configure.ac
>> +++ b/configure.ac
>> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ PKG_CHECK_MODULES([BLKID], [blkid >= 2.20], [AC_DEFINE([HAVE_BLKID], [1], [Defin
>>         [PKG_CHECK_MODULES([EXT2_BLKID], [blkid], [AC_DEFINE([HAVE_EXT2_BLKID], [1], [Define if libblkid is from libext2])])])
>>
>>  AC_ARG_ENABLE([tests],
>> -       AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-tests], [build internal test programs])
>> +       AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-tests], [always build internal test programs (not just for "make check")]),
>>         [enable_tests=yes]
> I have updated it like this and will apply it to #exfat-next.
>
> -       AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-tests], [build internal test programs])
> +       AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-tests], [always build internal test
> programs (not just for "make check")]),
> -       [enable_tests=yes]
> +       [enable_tests=$enableval],
> +       [enable_tests=no]
>
> Thanks!
Just a quick question: is this a real problem where "enable_tests" is
set to "yes" before running ./configure? I don't object to explicitly
specifying [enable_tests=no] as a common pattern going forward. I'm just
curious if there's any reasoning behind this.

Davo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.