Re: [PATCH v11 06/20] fsverity: don't allow setting DAX file attribute on fsverity files
Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jul 2026 19:46:43 -0400
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.fsverity,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260710234643.GF1911@quark> |
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote: > When fsverity is enabled on the file, with FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY ioctl(), > it checks if file has DAX enabled and fails if that's true. However, the > opposite case is not checked. > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Albershteyn <[email protected]> > --- > fs/file_attr.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/file_attr.c b/fs/file_attr.c > index bfb00d256dd5..5424ec4e3949 100644 > --- a/fs/file_attr.c > +++ b/fs/file_attr.c > @@ -246,6 +246,11 @@ static int fileattr_set_prepare(struct inode *inode, > if (fa->fsx_cowextsize == 0) > fa->fsx_xflags &= ~FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE; > > + /* Can not enable DAX on fsverity file */ > + if ((old_ma->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_VERITY) && > + fa->fsx_xflags & FS_XFLAG_DAX) > + return -EINVAL; > + This sounds like a bug fix. But actually ext4 already checks this in dax_compatible(), and the other filesystems that already supported fsverity (f2fs and btrfs) don't support DAX. So I guess this is really lifting that to common code? But the existing check is still being left in place because it's still needed for ext4 specific flags anyway? - Eric