Re: [Fuego] Docker terminology

"Bird, Tim" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.fuego
Message-ID <CY4PR13MB117592495428D673604AF8C6FD7E0@CY4PR13MB1175.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From:  Laszlo Sitzer
> 
> Hello!
> 
> I noticed that documentation and code mentions "docker volume bind mounts".
> From my understanding, in docker you either have ...
> 
> 
>  -  a "volume mount" (a docker volume attached to the container)
>  - or "bind mount" (a directory from the docker host bind mounted into the container)
> 
> So far I have only seen bind-mounts being used by the fuego-host-scripts and the Fuego docker container. So it is only bind-mounts?
> 
> Just wanted to check what others think about this aspect. Not too important but as of now it makes a not so simple project even harder to
> understand. Would be cool to stick to the terminology used by the respective components (Docker).

I didn't know there was a difference.  Now I know some more about docker. :-)
I agree we should use the terminology that docker uses.  I've updated the wiki
and a few places comments and the README where the 'volume mount' terminology
was used.   See this commit: 
https://bitbucket.org/fuegotest/fuego/commits/6cfc99915daae3508956ab06a3f338d661dd7455

Let me know if I missed anything.

Thanks for the suggestion.
 -- Tim
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.