Re: [Fuego] Docker terminology

Amazing! Thank you so much!

I am sorry if my tone was a bit know-it-all. I just had in mind future
users of Fuego.

Best,

Lazlo

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:19 PM Bird, Tim <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:  Laszlo Sitzer
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I noticed that documentation and code mentions "docker volume bind
> mounts".
> > From my understanding, in docker you either have ...
> >
> >
> >  -  a "volume mount" (a docker volume attached to the container)
> >  - or "bind mount" (a directory from the docker host bind mounted into
> the container)
> >
> > So far I have only seen bind-mounts being used by the fuego-host-scripts
> and the Fuego docker container. So it is only bind-mounts?
> >
> > Just wanted to check what others think about this aspect. Not too
> important but as of now it makes a not so simple project even harder to
> > understand. Would be cool to stick to the terminology used by the
> respective components (Docker).
>
> I didn't know there was a difference.  Now I know some more about docker.
> :-)
> I agree we should use the terminology that docker uses.  I've updated the
> wiki
> and a few places comments and the README where the 'volume mount'
> terminology
> was used.   See this commit:
>
> https://bitbucket.org/fuegotest/fuego/commits/6cfc99915daae3508956ab06a3f338d661dd7455
>
> Let me know if I missed anything.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.
>  -- Tim
>
>