Re: [Fuego] Dockerfile vs install-debian.sh
"Bird, Tim" <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:41:16 +0000
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.fuego |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CY4PR13MB11751E53BC78E1D6730A387DFD720@CY4PR13MB1175.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > Hi Georg > Tim: I have a question of your at the end. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Fuego <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Georg Piewald .... > That would super awesome. It would be good if you see my video on Youtube or at least read the slides to get a bit of background of what > I wanted to do with it. > Also if you have any question about why i did that, or if there is a missing piece of code please let me know. > > Tim: do you agree? Yes. See my other mail. Another item came up recently - which was the bit rot of the Fuego release test (Functional.fuego_release_test). That test uses (or is supposed to use) Dockerfile.test. We don't have a documented way to build an "extra-beefy" container with the extra stuff needed for selftesting (e.g. with chromium, selenium, and other bits). I'm not sure whether to integrate this into install.sh (with a new --test option), and whether the code should go into install.sh or be a separate script like install-debian.sh. Anyway - let's see what Georg comes up with and we'll take it from there. -- Tim