Re: [Fuego] Dockerfile vs install-debian.sh

"Bird, Tim" <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:41:16 +0000
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.fuego
Message-ID <CY4PR13MB11751E53BC78E1D6730A387DFD720@CY4PR13MB1175.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 

> Hi Georg
> Tim: I have a question of your at the end.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fuego <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Georg Piewald
....
> That would super awesome. It would be good if you see my video on Youtube or at least read the slides to get a bit of background of what
> I wanted to do with it.
> Also if you have any question about why i did that, or if there is a missing piece of code please let me know.
> 
> Tim: do you agree?
Yes.  See my other mail.

Another item came up recently - which was the bit rot of the Fuego release test
(Functional.fuego_release_test).  That test uses (or is supposed to use) Dockerfile.test.

We don't have a documented way to build an "extra-beefy" container with the extra
stuff needed for selftesting (e.g. with chromium, selenium, and other bits).  I'm not
sure whether to integrate this into install.sh (with a new --test option), and whether
the code should go into install.sh or be a separate script like install-debian.sh.

Anyway - let's see what Georg comes up with and we'll take it from there.
 -- Tim